
CASE STUDIES
Intelligence fused with legal strategy
Anonymised case studies demonstrating how we integrate intelligence, legal strategy and operational capabilities to deliver outcomes conventional firms cannot achieve.
Assets Recovered
Crisis Operations
Success Rate
Jurisdictions
Legal Strategy + Intelligence
Q2 2023
The Chess Operation

A fraudster stole millions and vanished to South America.
Client faced total loss. Legal action stalled without subject location. Asset recovery impossible without identification.
Subject was a serious chess player. No chess clubs existed in the suspected region. We created one.
Subject attended. We identified him and coordinated with legal counsel for next steps.
Target located. Asset recovery proceedings initiated. Positive outcome secured.
Intelligence creates leverage where legal process alone cannot.
Asset Recovery
Q4 2023
$165M Recovery

A nominee siphoned $165 million into a new company preparing for IPO. Legal routes would take years.
IPO would distribute proceeds across thousands of shareholders. Recovery would become effectively impossible.
Map fund flows. Identify pressure points. Deploy strategic pressure campaigns targeting IPO underwriters and board members.
We briefed legal counsel on nominee structure vulnerabilities. Applied coordinated pressure pre-listing.
Settlement forced before IPO. Full recovery achieved. Legal costs minimised.
Strategic pressure, guided by intelligence, delivers outcomes litigation cannot guarantee.
Crisis Management + Legal
Q3 2024
Deepfake Containment

A C-suite executive was targeted with a sophisticated deepfake video alleging insider trading. Distribution imminent.
Regulatory investigation likely. Shareholder litigation probable. Reputational damage irreversible if video went mainstream.
Trace deepfake origin. Identify distribution network. Contain before mainstream pickup. Coordinate with legal counsel on regulatory response.
We identified the source within 24 hours. Dismantled distribution infrastructure. Briefed legal team on proactive regulatory disclosure.
Deepfake contained before mainstream distribution. No regulatory action. Reputation intact.
Crisis intelligence must move faster than the threat. Legal strategy follows intelligence, not vice versa.
Narrative Risk + Litigation
Q1 2024
Hostile Campaign Neutralisation

A state-linked network planned a coordinated smear campaign to destabilise a major merger worth $2B.
Regulatory scrutiny would delay or kill the deal. Reputational damage would affect future transactions.
Map the influence network. Identify the operators. Dismantle the infrastructure before campaign launch.
We infiltrated the network. Identified key nodes. Coordinated with legal counsel on injunctive relief. Neutralised the threat.
Campaign dismantled before launch. Merger proceeded without disruption. Legal exposure eliminated.
Offensive intelligence prevents legal problems before they require defensive litigation.